Footer logo@2x (1)

How does Livery compare to WebRTC streaming solutions?

If you’re ready to turn your livestreams into an engaging experience that converts, you’ve probably considered WebRTC and Livery. But which solution is the better choice to make it happen?

Here are the major differences between Livery and WebRTC for interactive live video:

Ready to reach millions

Scalability is no problem with Livery

Ready to reach millions

Scalability is no problem with Livery

less than 3 seconds

WebRTC’s sub-second latency comes at a cost


Livery is more flexible in supporting features

Livery uses ULL-CMAF for the delivery of live content. ULL-CMAF combines the proven DASH and HLS protocols to achieve the lowest possible latency. This provides Livery with the flexibility to support off the shelf video features (DRM, subtitling, ad insertion, ABR), which you might know from the major VOD providers like YouTube, Netflix, Prime, ect.

Low Latency & synchronization

Livery enables you to add interactivity to your livestream (with no hassle!)

new revenue streams

Add monetization models to your streams


Higher quality, lower costs and increased battery efficiency


WebRTC is 4 to 8 times more expensive than Livery

You're in good company

Start interactive live streaming